Into you are able to trends for slimness one of women in antiquity, select Brown 1993: 229–30


153 The appearance of the young Roman Girl 37 Lucan dos.363–364: . umerisque haerentia primis / suppara nudatos cingunt angusta lacertos. (The garment is probably referred to regarding the plural here to possess reasons out of scansion.) 38 Towards the strophium, get a hold of Olson 2003: 203–5; Leary 1996: 198–9; Goldman 1994b: 233–5; cf. Richlin 1997, an interesting membership of your therapeutic uses of your girls human muscles, yet not a merchant account regarding Roman outfits or undergarments. 39 Ter. Eun. 313–317: haud similis virgost virginum nostrarum, quas matres pupil / demissis umeris esse, vincto pectore, ut gracilae sient. / lorsque qua est habitior paulo, pugilem esse aiunt, deducunt cibum: / tam etsi bonast natura, reddunt curatura iunceam: / itaque for this reason amantur. 40 See Olson 2003: 204, with references. 41 Prop. 4.–34: mox, ubi iam facibus cessit praetexta maritis, / vinxit et acceptas altera vitta comas . chatted about by the Edmondson, guy. step 1, contained in this regularity. 42 Val. 8.6: ultima virgineis tunc flens dedit oscula vittis. 43 Nonius 353 L = 236 Meters: minoris natu capite aperto erant, capillo pexo, vittis innexis crinibus. For much more detailed discussion to the vittae, get a hold of Fantham, guy. 7, in this frequency. forty two For the bulla, find Gabelmann 1985: 520–1, 523; Goette 1986; Palmer 1989 . It might features held ‘cures’ (remedia), prior to named ‘provisions’ (praebia), nevertheless these are never explicitly revealed: pick Macr. Sat. step 1.6.9; Palmer 1989 : 20–21. Sons out-of freedmen and you will slaves was in fact taboo to wear it (Palmer 1989 : 15, 69). Tarquinius Priscus is alleged to own already been the first to expose his child with an excellent bulla, since the a token out-of bravery, just like the child had murdered an adversary in the race whenever nevertheless off a years to put on the fresh bordered robe (Pliny HN ). Most bullae were made from silver (Festus thirty-two L = 36 M), however, Calpurnius Siculus (Ecl. six.41) talks regarding cup bullae (vitreas … bullas). Quaest. Rom 101 = Mor. 288a, stating that the fresh new bulla are worn by males regardless if its other signs of review were left off. 45 Plaut. Epid. 639–640: non meministi me auream post te afferre natali die lunulam atque anellum aureolum in the digitum? 46 Isid. Etym. : lunulae sunt ornamenta mulierum when you look at the lunae similtudinem, bullulae aureae dependentes. In this passageway mulierum cannot indicate ‘women’s,’ but simply ‘female.’ Ulpian (because the excerpted regarding the Digest 34.dos.25.9) states: ‘a heritage from female outfits boasts infant attire, women children’s clothes, and more youthful girls’ clothing; for all of us of the females intercourse is classified because women’ (muliebri veste legata et infantilem contineri et puellarum ainsi que virginum Pomponius libro vicesimo secundo advertising Sabinum recte scribit: mulieres enim omnes dici, quaecumque sexus feminini sunt). 47 Plaut. Rud. 1171: mais aussi bulla aurea est, pater quam dedit mi natali pass away. Here is the

The latest locket, including the toga praetexta, signified the brand new guy was not to get reached from the males to possess intimate motives: look for Plut

You’ll find nothing regarding graphic facts to indicate that ladies used the bulla. Because Goette highlights (1986: 144), you to definitely funerary save and that generally seems to inform you a woman sporting that it amulet towards the better examination in fact depicts the girl for the a beneficial necklace holding a round fruits so you can the lady bust (ibid. A possible Etruscan exemplory case of a female during the an effective bulla (ibid. Find together with Sebesta 1994a: 51n14; Palmer 1989 : 41n177. Goette 1990: 80–dos, 158–nine. Musei Capitolini, Rome, inv. On this subject statue-category, hence probably and additionally to start with incorporated a portrayal of dad, select George 2001. With the south frieze, Brick observes maybe not a good toga however, an excellent palla draped since a great toga (1994: 41 and you will n39; cf. George 2001: 189n25). Getting identifications associated with the figure, come across Gabelmann 1985: 522–3; George 2001: 184–5; Gercke 1968: 130; Kleiner 1993: 33 (in which she as well notices perhaps not good toga but a beneficial palla); Simon 1967: 19.